Compare Polar Bear vs Grizzly Bear

By | August 13, 2014

Who will win the fight between Polar Bear and Grizzly Bear?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
I am going to compare Polar bear vs Grizzly bear. It is topic of debate which bear going to win the fight. Go through article to know comparison and difference between grizzly bear vs polar bear.

Polar bear facts

Polar bear are found in cold areas and come under carnivorous mammal which is native to Arctic Circle( which surrounds seas and land masses). It is very large bear with weight around 350-700 kg. It is said as sister species of brown bear as polar bears live in particular areas with cold temperature which is surrounded with ice, snow and open water.

They used to hunt seals and seals are main source of their diets. They are known to live both and land and sea that’s why also referred as maritime animals. They hunt seals on edge of seas. They are vulnerable species and populations are declining at rapid rate due to loss of habitat and global warming. They are the king of their cultures.

They have large furry feet, sharp claws which allow them to adopt the traction on ice. They found in arctic area near Newfoundland Island, James Bay in Canada, humid continental and subarctic, Nowegian mainland and Kuril Islands in sea of Okhotsk etc. The countries where they found most often are Denmark, United States, Alaska, Norway and Canada.

Polar bear are arctic zoo animals with powerful limbs which help them to run on land. With the change of whether, seals migrate from one area to another and thus polar bear follow them because they are primary source of their diet.

Grizzly bear facts

Grizzly bear is same as brown bear and many called them sub species of North American brown bear because both are one species of two areas( continent). Moreover, some people call grizzly with nick name “silvertip bear” because of its silver sheen in its fur.

Grizzly bear is widespread solitary active animal which is often found in coastal areas like lakes, rivers, streams and ponds. The grizzly comes from golden and grey hairy fur of bear. It is also said that ancestors of grizzly bears are brown bears. The average weight of Grizzly bear is 180-360 Kg ie. 270 Kg. the length is of 198 cm and shoulder height is of 102 cm and hind foot is of 28 cm.

Coastal bear are heavier and more in weight and one huge grizzly recorded bear is of 680 kg. They are found in areas like North America, Canada, Europe and Asia. The numbers are decreasing at rapid rate due to hunting and loss of habitat. They are long living animal and females life is more than males because females are not involved in any fights. The average life of male is 22 years while for females it is 26 years.

Grizzly bear are both omnivores and carnivore. The diet includes both plants and animals. The expected animal preys of grizzly bear include bison, black bears, moose, deer, mule, deer, bighorn, caribou, fish and injured calves.

Compare Polar bear vs grizzly bear

In last post, I did comparison of Polar bear vs wolverine but now I am going to compare Grizzly bear vs Polar. By going through the detailed comparison, you can also know difference between them.

Polar bear vs Grizzly bear Comparison

Polar bear vs Grizzly bear Comparison

Comparison is given below:

AnimalsPolar BearGrizzly bear
KingdomAnimaliaAnimalia
FamilyUrsidaeUrsidae
GenusUrsusUrsus
Average Length7 ft 10 inch- 9 ft to 10 inch6.5 ft
Average Tail7-13 cm5 cm
Average Height133 cm102 cm
ClassMammaliaMammalia
AreaArctic, Newfoundland island, Canada, Norway, Denmark, Russia, United statesAsia, North America, Canada and Europe
OrderCarnivoraCarnivora, Omnivora
HabitatArctic circle, sub, arctic, humid continentalIn Alaska dense near the coast, continental united states
TeethCanines are larger, sharper and more jaggedLarge and sharp incisor teeth
Force54
Stamina55
Weight350-700 kg80-360 kg
Intelligent55
Average Life SpanBeyond 25 years22 for females and 26 for males

Who will win the fight? Many want to know who would going to win the fight between- Grizzly bear vs Polar bear. It is question of debate- Polar bear are large and more in weight in comparison to grizzly bear and more sharp teeth and powerful paws but grizzly on other hand are robust, compact bone structure and more aggressive in comparison to Polar bear.

Polar bear are largest but not robust as like other bears. Polar bear have thinner and longer skull in comparison to grizzly. Grizzly has thick, shorter and heavy skull and more powerful shoulder structure. I seen a video in which Grizzly in cold condition is still showing aggression against Polar bears and I will go with grizzly bear.

When Ice melts, polar bear driven to grizzly area and then grizzly have enough to fight with Polar bears. So, grizzly bear would be winner. I hope you like Grizzly bear vs polar bear comparison.

87 thoughts on “Compare Polar Bear vs Grizzly Bear

  1. Rasmus Dehlendorff

    Area: Denmark… Is this a joke or just pure ignorance?
    Must be a troll.

    Reply
    1. Aka/Tony

      Oh their goes Orcacrusher333 again and again, comparing everything by bite force… btw polar bears have more savage jaws while grizzlies have more force.

      Reply
    2. Jacob Renji Koshy

      Get out! Polar bear had a bite force of 1200 psi
      Grizzly had a bite of 1600 psi

      Reply
  2. Tony\Aka

    Okay, on the chart it said that a polar bears force is greater than a grizzlies. The grizzly doesn’t have one advantage over the polar bear besides a slightly more powerful bite.

    Reply
  3. Nick

    Polar bears are a much more aggressive species of bear. Much worse temper, much bigger, thicker skin and bones. Your definitely wrong on lots of your bear information.

    Reply
    1. James W.

      AKA/Troll..
      ” Dude, try & stay on topic.”
      You do realize, don’t you kid.. that admonishment is just too funny..
      .. coming from you.. oh, the irony..

      & topic-wise, the brown bear & ice bear are so closely related that
      they can successfully interbreed.. as it happens..

      Where the natural range of both bears overlap.. the brownie does
      generally dominates whitey, as he is more used to social competition,
      this being somewhat similar to the way – lions also dominate tigers..
      ..its in their nature – as a regular habitual behaviour..

      Reply
      1. Julia

        Sweet Jesus, here goes James again. Everyone grab some popcorn and relax, this is going to be a loooooong show.

        Reply
  4. AKa/Tony

    Oh my god. You’re still ranting on and on about the lion beating the tiger? Absolutely ridiculous. As for staying on topic, what else what I be commenting? Polar bear wins because he’s bigger and stronger! Same for lion and tiger. Lion and tigers can also breed successfully too, you know.

    Reply
    1. James W.

      OYG/Tiny..
      The ‘stupid boy’ –
      is still in denial..
      & too afraid of the facts.. to even check the reality..

      Look up actual interaction reports of brown bears with ice bears..
      You are wrong kid, in both instances, bears & cats-wise..

      Reply
  5. Aka/Tony

    I suppose you imagine hat size doesn’t matter. Average lions are around 400 pounds. Siberian tigers average around 700 pounds. The tiger can grow to be TWICE THE SIZE OF A LION. I’m afraid to check the facts? I’ve been constantly providing facts, you’ve just been dancing around them. You have literally provided no facts. Why does the grizzly bear beat the polar bear? Tell me why. Polar bears are the much better hunters, are stronger, bigger, have sharper claws and have more savage, dangerous jaws. The grizzly has more bite force, but their bites are not as savage as polar bears. Grizzly bears are 2 mph faster and an average basis, have more robust bones and have slightly larger claws. The fact that you claim lions bigger than tigers, proves you know nothing about the animal kingdom. So why should I believe a word you say?

    Reply
  6. James W.

    aka/turkey..
    Wrong yet again, kid..
    Check the scientific facts.. & give your dumb-as “opinion” a rest..

    Fact: scientific measurements, the weights taken from wild panther species..
    do clearly show: currently the average lion weight- is heavier than any other wild cat.

    & the historical facts confirm, boss lions are the more formidable fighters..

    However, per this thread topic, observations also show – when they are in contact,
    brownie bears do dominate whitey bears.. even if its just a ‘pat-a-cake’ contest..
    ..over who gets dibs on the dumpster diving – for the choicest garbage going..

    Reply
    1. Aka/Tony

      Oh I swear if you start saying lions are better hunters than tigers… I will never believe a word you say. So according to you, the lion has EVERY advantage over the tiger. According to you, the tiger doesn’t have a single advantage. Oh, you are so wrong. I have a question for you: Is it POSSIBLE for a tiger to beat a lion? Please say yes. Because if you don’t… well, then you belong in an unknown planet.

      Reply
    2. Chris

      James, stop making yourself look like a fool. Go read a book instead or simply learn the alphabet. You shouldn‘t express yourself on stuff you dont know jackshit about;)

      Reply
    3. Tigeramur

      You are so retarded”Lion is the heaviest feline” Your so rong i literally pasted it from the internet, see. The Amur or Siberian tiger is the largest subspecies of the Panthera genus, known to weigh up to 800 lbs (360 kg), while large African lions weigh up to 550 lbs (250 kg). Average weight males is 181 kg for African lion, 221.2 kg for Bengal tiger and 230 kg for Siberian tiger. See copied that from the web doubt you know better

      Reply
    4. Conner Smith

      Dude those are the most bs facts I’ve ever heard in my life

      Reply
  7. James W.

    AKA/Tiny..
    Look it up, kid.
    It is a matter of established scientific fact..
    Tigers have been persecuted so hard in the wild..
    ..that they, as measured there – are on average, now smaller than lions..
    & FYI, more tigers now live in captivity, than in the wild..

    But this is a bear vs bear thread kid.. & its also a fact..
    ..that mean ol’ grizzlies do – dominate the blubber-sucking whiteys..

    Reply
    1. James W.

      Aka/Jokie,
      you again
      offer yet more trash..

      Check the science..

      Yamaguchi, for example, since he has
      published a meta-analysis of actual weights
      of wild tigers & lions measured in the field, &
      guess what.. on ‘average’ – lions are bigger!

      Reply
        1. James W.

          Aka/Joker..
          Too funny!
          “Bowling balls”!
          What infantile trash you post boy, & sans shame.. tsk tsk..

          Look up ‘Kitchener & Yamaguchi’, for some real research, dumb-as..
          Since in 2010, Yamaguchi wrote:
          “…on average the lion can be said to be the biggest living cat…”

          Got that? Fact check it, & learn something real – eh, kid..

          Reply
          1. Aka/Tony

            Bowling balls? What are you talking about? You call EARTH RANGERS infinite trash? Hey James, is National Geographic trash too? No, your garbage 20% comments are nowhere near as good of source that I’ve posted. You stupid, James. I’ve never met a bigger idiot.

          2. James W.

            Aka/Turkey,
            jeeze kid, clearly..
            you don’t even read the trash sites you link!
            “Bowling balls” – what a dumb-as value.

            About on your level though, eh ‘stupid boy’,
            even though you don’t actually read it,
            – let alone any proper research…

            Look in the mirror kid, & see an “idiot”
            staring stupidly right back at you..

  8. KH

    Polar Bear. They are just much larger and there teeth are vicious. If you just take two average specimens the size difference is gigantic that alone probably would allow the polar bear to win by luck a good portion of the time. The author is giving too much weight to the agression factor imo. A Polar Bear will have no problems figthing for its life.

    Reply
    1. Aka/Tony

      I do read my sites, James. And I get good sites, unlike you no-brain.

      Reply
      1. James W.

        Aka/Jerko,
        Nah, no way..
        You quite evidently – pretty much only link – utter trash sites,
        which match your own ‘stupid boy’ opinions – for dumb-assery.

        Even then, you seldom read, or comprehend them, like “bowling balls”- L.O.L…
        & as for doing a proper search of really reputable, evidence-based sites,
        such as scientific journal papers via google scholar, you sure don’t..

        Basically, Jacksie, you’re a fanboi-troll & uninterested in factual reality.

        Reply
        1. Aka/Tony

          Trash sites. Look at me with a straight face and say National Geographic is a trash site. As if your twenty percent comments is better!

          Reply
          1. James W.

            Aka/Jokey,
            Look kid,
            like so many dumb-as people,
            you just don’t get how stupid you are..
            But Nat Geo does, so they offer dumb-as level – trash, for you..

  9. Spookypld

    Polar , White bears are superior swimmers. In the clash between too the result would repent on the environment. On land the grizzly bear is stronger, agiler, faster, lighter and superior aggressors. Check the video showing how well does grizzly brown bears underneath land surface, while hunting prey. It will stall You!

    Reply
    1. Aka/Tony

      You dumbass, everyone knows Nat Geo scientifically studies animals. But no, you think twenty percent of comments on a dumb site are better. See, now your just desperate. You’ve lost your mind.

      Reply
  10. Julia

    Neutral. In my OPINION, it would most likely end up with a grizzly 60%, polar bear 40%, because a grizzly is more aggressive, and has the most powerful forepaws and arms of any creature in the entire kingdom. If the polar bear was serious and defending her cubs, she would most likely win. Same with the grizzly. It depends on how determined the bears were. Also, James W, calling people tiny, that’s real clever. Wow, marry my daughter. You try too hard to offend people. I’ll bet you are an edgy 12 year old trying to be cool. A tiger would win against a lion, 90%. What happened to defending the tiger in the grizzly vs tiger? I thought the bears were ‘fat, slow beasts’? Anyway, I know this comment won’t stop James, and he will just make a “savage” comeback like calling me ‘Juelous’ or ‘Jelly’, but hey, I got to express my anger. Thanks for reading!

    Reply
    1. James W.

      Juliar,
      Angry?
      Like a bear with a sore head, huh..
      You blatantly show typical female double standards,
      claiming ‘offense’, but offering it up – all the same!

      Funny thing is, I cannot dispute your bear VS bear view,
      but you are evidently uninformed about lion dominance.

      Its true that bears have developed powerful forearms
      for digging/hauling salmon/seals out, but Panthera are true killers,
      who have superior musculo-skeletal capabilities for actually doing so.

      Reply
      1. Aka/Tony

        James, you are the biggest idiot I’ve ever met. Your best insult is “Tiny”? You just have no idea, do you James.

        Reply
        1. James W.

          Aka/Tiny,
          “Idiot”?
          That’s you – a dumb-as kid,
          only interested in fantasy trash,
          – that suits your own infantile opinions.

          & seemingly incapable of learning from actual
          properly validated, well-researched evidence-based
          scientific sources..

          So, shame on you kid, best you lose the dumb-as ‘tude,
          or you’ll set yourself up as a loser as a ‘grown-up’, too…

          Reply
          1. Aka/Tony

            Says the guy who thinks 20% of comments on some garbage sights are better than National Geographic!

          2. Aka/Tony

            SHAME ON ME? Says the guy who thinks National Geographic is a garbage sites, and twenty percent of comments from some dumb site has more knowledge than National Geographic AND eighty percent of comments on that site!

      1. James W.

        Aka/Jerky,
        Typical..
        A 12 y/o ‘know all’ – kid, so ‘stupid boy’,
        all arrogance, & no self-awareness.

        Will you ever get it kid? Or just stay a dumb-as..
        % ‘votes’, & total numbers of ignorant comments – posted,
        means nothing, it is actual validated research, that matters.

        Reply
        1. Aka/Tony

          No, eighty percent of people have common sense. Common, James. You obviously feel cornered. National Geographic IS science, so shut your oversized mouth up.

          Reply
          1. James W.

            Aka/Jakey,
            Nah, kid..
            More likely, 80% are dumb-as, like you..
            & Nat Geo ‘dumbs down’ – to suit such stupidity..

  11. Lisa hansen

    exept that a polar bear doesn’t live wild in denmark or norway only in captivity since it is not cold enough for the polar bear

    Reply
    1. Aka/Tony

      You stupid ass! National geographic is better than 20% of stupid comments. Look at all the sites I’ve shown you! But no, apparently 20% of garbage comments are better! James, you are so dumb. Most of the world is against you. Your like one of those donald trump supporters who think they’re right, and nobody else is right!

      Reply
      1. James W.

        Aka/Stupid boy.
        Dumb-as,
        You still fail to comprehend..
        The major difference between, basic level
        trash produced by Nat Geo – as entertainment,
        & proper scientifically validated, evidence-based research.

        Maybe you’ll grow up, & develop some emotional maturity kid,
        along with the ability to accept facts ( or learn how to fact-check),
        (FYI, wacko-Jacko, try & get it, fact verification is not a matter of ‘votes’!).

        But you’re a long way from doing so yet, nor have you shown any such
        potential – to be able to grasp these fundamental issues, so far..

        Looks kinda like one of the few things the ol’ troll – rob – got right,
        was to write you off – as a hopelessly pig-headed, purblind fool…

        Reply
  12. William Hassleton

    Allow me to add the prevailing reasoning why either of these bears/beasts might win in an individual faceoff at any time.

    Bite force has been mentioned going to the Polar bear,, it is totally irrelevant. Both have powerful enough biting & “penetrating power” to do just that,, “penetrate” the other’s outer layer of fur deep into their underlying dermis. If & when one or the other would gain a sizable advantage,, their penetrating bites would depend on the “ripping & tearing motion” in a downward path opening large gapes into the other possibly tearing into vital muscle tissue,, ligaments or internal organs. Whichever gained this type of initial advantage,, would be the eventual winner causing massive bleeding by the other causing quickly waning strength.

    Either of these bears are able to & have the capacity to gain such a quick initial advantage with the grizzly possibly (being the smaller & more compact creature) diving toward the underbelly of the polar bear causing fatal wounds in it’s soft & more exposed underside. On the other hand,, the polar bear being far larger could in the early stage of battle,, possibly pin the grizzly down or roll it over early on ripping away at it’s softer & more exposed regions as well.

    The actual size of these creatures would actually play a very small role in the eventual outcome of a one on one battle which inevitably would depend on the fighting capacity & energy level of each creature. In the end,, both have the means to defeat one another with both being the quintessential apex predator in nature.

    The polar bear seems more capable in size but size alone has very little to do with final results. A full grown grizzly merely doesn’t know defeat,, such as the polar bear itself,, they would both battle mightily based upon their tenacity & will to survive realizing they’re both kings in their perspective regions or domains.

    It would be a battle of monumental proportion possibly ending in a bloody Mexican standoff where both walked away realizing their own will & the opposing might of their adversary..

    Reply
  13. James W.

    Aka/Idiot,
    pathetic.
    Jacko, you just have to be trolling now,
    either that, or you are as much of a dumb-as..
    ..as bad ol’ rob reckoned you were, & that’s truly “sad”..

    Anyhow, for sure, brown bears vary considerably in temperament,
    most of Eurasian living brownies (in Europe & Tibet) are circumspect,
    which is why they have survived ( albeit, in small numbers) ’til today.

    But ‘grizzly’ bears, living in Nth Siberia & America are known to be
    much more aggressive, & yes kid – actual research – shows them also
    to be the dominant instigator interactively, when they meet ice bears,
    just as lions dominated tigers, in shared natural settings, back in the day, too.

    Reply
  14. Aka/Tony

    Dude, you are so backwards. Here’s how it it goes: Tiger beats lion and polar bear beats brown bear! Please, give me a link besides 20% of comments. Those really are just people’s opinion, not actual science. I have shown you science. National Geographic.

    Reply
  15. James W.

    Aka/Joke..
    Nah kid,
    you really have no idea..

    FYI, check out this link, http://carnivoraforum.com/topic/9329122/3
    – the page cites a number of actual research sources, some of which
    are ‘dumbed down’ by Nat Geo, to entertain “idiots” – like you..

    So now, – try to get it through your dumb-as brain, at long last – huh, kid..

    Grizz whips whitey, & goldie beats down stripey, in a cuz-on- cuz battle..

    Reply
  16. Aka/Tony

    Really? All that article talked about was that west african lions are endangered. How does this help prove your point? idiot. Your calculations are incorrect. nat Geo is the top source, idiot.

    Reply
  17. James W.

    Aka/Idiot..
    Look kid..
    I wrote,
    “check…the page…for actual research sources..”
    & naturally, that means.. scroll down the page, & click on the citations..

    Which, of course – you, as usual – simply didn’t bother to do..

    So, who’s the kid with the nickname “Stupid Boy”?
    Hey EVERYONE, see why – its Jackie – (aka/tony)..

    Reply
  18. Aka/Tony

    James, you’re an idiot. You refuse to believe realism. National Geographic is the top source. Congrats, you found a site besides a bunch of comments. Now compare that to all the other sites I’ve shown you. James, if there were 101 people in an argument, I’m the 100, and you’re the one. 100 against 1. That’s how it is.

    Reply
  19. James W.

    Aka/turkey,
    Hey dumb-as,
    you just don’t get it – do you..

    Jacko, stop being so pathetic..

    To quote Dr Rick Marshall,
    “Science shows no mercy, & neither do I.”

    Votes just don’t come into it, nor does your useless opinion,
    nor those of an unlimited number of pigheaded ignoramus morons,
    who are just like you – in your “stupid boy” fantasy notions..

    Nat Geo is NOT a source in its self, either – how do you not get this?
    N-G rely on/buy/present – the work done by others – in the field.

    But much of the ‘dumbed down’ stuff they actually present,
    which is intended for basic-level, dumb-as
    idiots like you, is all too often – poorly fact-checked.

    Reply
  20. Peter

    why are you arguing with a lower class human who doesnt even know about research papers, let alone how to read it?
    He is using a TV show as top notch evidence, what a failure.

    Tony, fucker, go educate yourself first before you try to discuss with adults, kiddo!

    Reply
    1. Aka/Tony

      Bitch, don’t tell me what to do! You need some knowledge! You think James has it? You think he’s right? Than you’re an idiot too. James thinks a lion will easily kill a polar bear. Get out, bitch.

      Reply
  21. Aka/Tony

    Oh my god just shut up! You are so stupid! You find one link that doesn’t even prove your point, and you match that against all the links I’ve shown you.

    Reply
  22. James W.

    Aka/Jokey..
    Troll on, kid.

    You once claimed to accept “common sense”.
    But if you’d picked any up, then you’d understand,
    – when the facts & your dumb-as opinion clash – go with the facts..

    Just try & educate yourself with some real research, huh..
    http://jeb.biologists.org/content/216/6/960.full

    Reply
  23. Aka/Tony

    James, I know I’ve won this debate, so I’m not even gonna argue with you any more. I’m just wasting my time.

    Reply
  24. James W.

    AKA/Tiny,
    “won”, huh?

    You sure won the ‘waste of time’ award, kid.
    Along with your well-deserved “Stupid boy” nickname.

    Other than a pigheaded refusal to face facts,
    – you got nothin’ – but your delusions, Jerky-boy..

    Reply
  25. Aka/Tony

    You’re right James. I did earn that award. For wasting my time on a moron like you.

    Reply
  26. James W.

    Aka/Tronkus,
    Yeah, ’bout the only ‘award’ you’d win,
    is in the ‘waste of space’ category..

    Grow up, you snotty, petulant child..

    Brown bear dominates white bear.
    Lion dominates tiger, so just – face the facts, boy..

    Reply
  27. Aka/Tony

    Lol, you’re making me laugh. You know you’re wrong. Just admit it. I earn only one award. The victory award.

    Reply
  28. James W.

    Aka/Tithead..
    I laugh..
    at your hubristic pride..
    & justly Award you,

    ‘Fatuous Childmind’

    Yeah, that’s right ’bout your level –
    ~3rd grade, that is..

    So jack-ass, jest stop squealin’ like the lil sucka you are,
    keep yo’ stupid-as yap off yo’ momma’s titty,
    & git on wit’ growin’ – da hell up..

    Reply
  29. Aka/Tony

    Why you mad bro? Or are you just salty? Both. All of these threads are are like everyone against you. You have no idea how crazy you sound! And now you’re talking like you were born in the hood? You make me laugh man…

    Reply
    1. James W.

      Aka/Salty.
      Funny, kid..
      You are the one who RANTS BIG,
      while freely using emotive profanities.
      A warning sign of incipient/prodromal insanity..

      & yet you remain implacably stupid,
      such as by your so laughably claiming that
      you represent “all… everyone…” Hilarious..

      But hey, turkey – you are right about one thing,
      iz all jest a bit o’ fun, taking yo’ to task, for bein’ a dumb-ask..

      & oh yeah, bad ol’ grizz whips icey-whitey too, punk..

      Reply
  30. Aka/Tony

    Please, show me a link that proves you’re point. Oh wait, I forgot, you can’t!

    Reply
  31. Aka/Tony

    The funny part is though… the grizzly bear ran away in the video! Now, give me a link that says lions will dominate tigers.

    Reply
  32. James W.

    Aka/Jacksie..
    Bubba sez whaaa…

    Jeeze boy, you are such a dumb-as kid.

    grizzly bears have to cope with much more
    varied situations & circumstances than
    their ice-living cousins..
    & way more difficult competition &
    potential prey catch & kill it, too..
    ( Even if both bears really do prefer eating
    rich food-type garbage – dumped by humans).

    As a result, the grizz dominates whitey,
    (yes, even over dumpster diving rights)..
    as the research clearly shows ..
    & only a ‘stupid boy’ does not get that.. L.O.L…

    Reply
  33. Aka/Tony

    Yeah, but brown bears couldn’t hunt beluga whales so… yeah.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *